A group of scientists
gathered last week to debate over what a planet actually is. After a popular
vote, the congregation decided that Pluto does, indeed, fit the description of
a planet — at least for the purposes of our solar system. The debate over
Pluto’s fate took place at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
between three experts.
After a debate in front of an audience of scientists, teachers and civilians, the three scientists took a vote on Pluto. Two of them voted that Pluto should be a planet and the other voted against.
After a debate in front of an audience of scientists, teachers and civilians, the three scientists took a vote on Pluto. Two of them voted that Pluto should be a planet and the other voted against.
The initial decision to
remove Pluto from the solar system was made in 2006 by the International
Astronomical Union (IAU), who determined Pluto was too small to qualify as a
planet when compared to the other eight planets in the solar system. Many
astronomical objects larger than Pluto have been discovered, like the dwarf
planet Eris that was never considered to be planets. The reasoning was that
Pluto shouldn’t count as a planet either if other bigger worlds weren’t earning
the classification.
The definition of what
a planet is has changed several times in recent history, but the argument put
forward by the first scientist in favor of Pluto’s planet-hood had little to do
with the official definition. A historian named Owen Gingerich argued that a
planet is not determined by astronomical definitions but by human culture.
Therefore Pluto must be a planet because humanity decided it was long ago.
Dimitar Sasselov’s
argument was much more scientific in nature. Sasselov, the director of
Harvard’s planetary program, the Origins of Life Initiative, claimed that a
planet is defined as the smallest spherical lump of matter that formed around
stars or stellar remnants, meaning Pluto is a planet.
The scientist who
argued against Pluto as a planet was Gareth Williams from the IAU’s Minor
Planets Center. He argued that a planet is a spherical body that orbits the Sun
and has cleared its path, meaning Pluto can’t be a planet.
The Harvard audience
voted and overwhelmingly supported Sasselov’s argument in favor of Pluto being
called a planet.
No comments:
Post a Comment