Scientists have make
available new indication that the moon was once part of our planet, but
billions of years ago, "broke away" from it in a collision with
another celestial body.
Now that planetary
scientists to understand where there is water on the natural satellite of our
planet, all the scholarly attention has focused on the more fundamental
question: how, after all, come from the moon itself? And how is it that she
seemed bound rotated in space in tune with the Earth?
Another "Lunar
rain" poured this week, albeit in the form of several sensational research
scientists who have provided new evidence of the origin of the Moon from the
Earth. Astrophysicists shed light on some dark spots in the theory of the
origin of the moon, according to a celestial body which was born as a result of
large-scale clashes between the proto-Earth and another planet of the solar
system.
Experts have prepared a
brief guide to the new findings:
What happened to the
Earth?
There is a theory that
about 4.5 billion years ago the planet, comparable in size to Mars and was
named Theia (Theia), crashed into a large "proto-Earth." Upon impact
Theia crumbled to pieces, which formed a sort of "dust" belt around
the Earth. Soon they were united to form the Moon.
This theory of
"crash" seemed to explain and contemporary dimensions of the Earth
and the Moon and their relative distance from each other. But, however,
scientists have many questions remained: it was found that the chemistry is not
quite physics - the chemical composition of the planet and its satellites do
not fit into this slim physical theory. At least it was until now.
Chemical evidence of
interplanetary "accident"
A new study published
in the journal Nature, is based on a study of zinc in lunar rock samples
collected by astronauts famous mission "Apollo." Geologists have
found that the ratio of heavy and light isotopes of zinc is different from what
are traditionally terrestrial rocks. However, scientists have found that this
"discrepancy" could be due to an intense period of evaporation in the
early era of the formation of the Moon. In other words, this means that the
surface of the satellite was so hot that zinc began to evaporate.
The ratio of
"analysis"
Further chemical
analysis of lunar soil samples also proved that it contained quite “mundane”
items - the same number of the same type of oxygen, titanium, silicon and other
elements.
These data led
scientists to revise their ideas about how the moon formed - probably in the
formation of particles Teyi satellite played less prominent role than
previously thought. The fact that the Moon and the Earth, in fact, were molded
from the same material gives grounds to assume that the moon - is not only a
satellite of our planet, but also part of it broke away in a cosmic
"accidents."
As far as this idea is
grounded
There are some
inconsistencies in the proposed scenario, the formation of planets. Main
"difference" scientists see that the 24-hour rotation of the Earth -
is too slow loop to "throw" is enough material to form the Moon.
However, a new computer model of astrophysicists at Harvard, argues that the
Earth at the dawn of their lives could be rotated much faster - in prehistory
day could last only 2-3 hours. Such speeds, according to the scientists, it
would be enough to set the "impulse "for the formation of a celestial
body, such as the moon.
No comments:
Post a Comment